Compliance Standards We Support
Who We Serve
Built for Financial Professionals
From in-house accounting and filing teams to accountancy firms managing multiple clients, the workflow stays controlled, reviewable, and filing-ready.
Standardize Multi-Client Filing Workflows
Accountancy firms converting annual reports for multiple clients need a repeatable way to produce validated iXBRL without rebuilding the process for every engagement.
How We Help
- A repeatable workflow from PDF or Word report to validated iXBRL package
- Visual review tools to inspect, adjust, and sign off mappings before export
- Built-in Arelle and filing-rule validation before delivery or submission
Common Challenges
- Keeping taxonomy mapping and review consistent across client files
- Moving partner and manager review forward without delaying filing deadlines
- Ensuring every package passes validation before submission
Standardize Multi-Client Filing Workflows
Accountancy firms converting annual reports for multiple clients need a repeatable way to produce validated iXBRL without rebuilding the process for every engagement.
How We Help
- A repeatable workflow from PDF or Word report to validated iXBRL package
- Visual review tools to inspect, adjust, and sign off mappings before export
- Built-in Arelle and filing-rule validation before delivery or submission
Common Challenges
- Keeping taxonomy mapping and review consistent across client files
- Moving partner and manager review forward without delaying filing deadlines
- Ensuring every package passes validation before submission
Internal Filing and Review Workflows
In-house accounting and filing teams need a practical way to turn approved annual reports into validated iXBRL packages while keeping review ownership inside the finance function.
How We Help
- Guided conversion from PDF or Word reports into reviewable iXBRL
- A visual editor for checking mappings, disclosures, and exceptions before export
- Validated output packages ready for filing or handoff
Common Challenges
- Translating approved reports into the correct taxonomy concepts and filing package
- Keeping clear review control between preparers, reviewers, and filing owners
- Validating output against KVK or ESEF rules before submission deadlines
Internal Filing and Review Workflows
In-house accounting and filing teams need a practical way to turn approved annual reports into validated iXBRL packages while keeping review ownership inside the finance function.
How We Help
- Guided conversion from PDF or Word reports into reviewable iXBRL
- A visual editor for checking mappings, disclosures, and exceptions before export
- Validated output packages ready for filing or handoff
Common Challenges
- Translating approved reports into the correct taxonomy concepts and filing package
- Keeping clear review control between preparers, reviewers, and filing owners
- Validating output against KVK or ESEF rules before submission deadlines
Multi-Entity Reporting Requirements
Organizations managing multiple Dutch entities face compounded compliance requirements. Each BV or NV may need separate KVK filings, while EU-listed parent companies must also meet ESEF requirements for their consolidated reports.
How We Help
- Support for both Dutch GAAP (SBR) and IFRS (ESEF) taxonomies
- Separate conversion projects for each entity's annual report
- Extension concept support for group-specific disclosures
Common Challenges
- Different filing requirements for operating companies vs. holding entities
- Coordinating Dutch GAAP filings alongside IFRS consolidated reports
- Maintaining consistency in taxonomy usage across group entities
Multi-Entity Reporting Requirements
Organizations managing multiple Dutch entities face compounded compliance requirements. Each BV or NV may need separate KVK filings, while EU-listed parent companies must also meet ESEF requirements for their consolidated reports.
How We Help
- Support for both Dutch GAAP (SBR) and IFRS (ESEF) taxonomies
- Separate conversion projects for each entity's annual report
- Extension concept support for group-specific disclosures
Common Challenges
- Different filing requirements for operating companies vs. holding entities
- Coordinating Dutch GAAP filings alongside IFRS consolidated reports
- Maintaining consistency in taxonomy usage across group entities
Frameworks
Understanding the Regulatory Landscape
Dutch annual report filing requirements depend on your company type and applicable accounting framework.
Dutch GAAP
For most Dutch companies
Companies filing with the KVK under Dutch accounting standards use the SBR taxonomy, which combines BW2-Titel9 (Dutch Civil Code) and RJ (Dutch Accounting Standards) concepts.
IFRS (ESEF)
For EU-listed companies
Companies listed on EU regulated markets must file annual reports in ESEF format, using the IFRS taxonomy with inline XBRL tagging of primary financial statements.
Your Data, Protected
Financial data requires strong security controls. Primary application hosting and storage are configured in the EU, with additional compliance documentation available on request.
SOC 2 Type II
All infrastructure partners hold independently audited SOC 2 Type II certifications.
EU-hosted storage
Primary hosting and persistent storage are configured in the EU. Additional transfer safeguards are available where cross-border processing is needed.
GDPR Compliant
GDPR-oriented controls, data portability, deletion workflows, and DPA materials available on request.
Human Oversight
AI suggests mappings, you approve. Every output requires your review before export.
SOC 2 Type II
All infrastructure partners hold independently audited SOC 2 Type II certifications.
EU-hosted storage
Primary hosting and persistent storage are configured in the EU. Additional transfer safeguards are available where cross-border processing is needed.
GDPR Compliant
GDPR-oriented controls, data portability, deletion workflows, and DPA materials available on request.
Human Oversight
AI suggests mappings, you approve. Every output requires your review before export.
Our providers are certified: